Activate Activate Activate
contact  
Hello. Sign in to personalize your visit. New user? Register now.  

In
By author
Journal of Cold War Studies

Quarterly
(Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall)
192 pp. per issue, 6 x 9
Founded: 1999
ISSN 1520-3972
E-ISSN 1531-3298

Journal of Cold War Studies

Spring 2006, Vol. 8, No. 2, Pages 83-113
Posted Online May 24, 2006.
(doi:10.1162/jcws.2006.8.2.83)
© 2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Rethinking Nonproliferation: LBJ, the Gilpatric Committee, and U.S. National Security Policy

Hal Brands

Hal Brands is a Ph.D. candidate in the history department at Yale University.



PDF (148.91 KB) PDF Plus (151.914 KB)



Abstract

In late 1964, Lyndon Johnson and National Security Adviser McGeorge Bundy convened an ad hoc group of distinguished citizens to consider the problem of nuclear proliferation. The creation of this group, known as the Gilpatric Committee, signaled Johnson's fear that a number of foreign policy issues related to proliferation had reached a crisis point in 1964. It also signaled his dissatisfaction with existing bureaucratic arrangements to resolve these problems. After several weeks of deliberation, the committee gave Johnson a report that advocated a sharp intensification of U.S. nonproliferation policy. The committee challenged key aspects of the administration's foreign policy and urged the president to rethink the nature of the U.S.-Soviet relationship. Although Johnson shied away from implementing some of the committee's more controversial proposals, the administration eventually embraced the basic philosophy of the report. The Gilpatric Report provided a conceptual foundation for important departures in U.S. foreign relations and national security policy from 1965 until the end of Johnson's presidency.

Technology Partner - Atypon Systems, Inc.
  CrossRef member COUNTER member