Activate Activate Activate
contact  
Hello. Sign in to personalize your visit. New user? Register now.  

In
By author
Computational Linguistics

Quarterly (March, June, September, December)
160 pp. per issue
6 3/4 x 10
Founded: 1974
ISSN 0891-2017
E-ISSN 1530-9312
2008 ISI Impact Factor: 2.656

Computational Linguistics

March 2007, Vol. 33, No. 1, Pages 3-8
Posted Online March 7, 2007.
(doi:10.1162/coli.2007.33.1.3)
© 2007 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Identifying Sources of Disagreement: Generalizability Theory in Manual Annotation Studies

Petra Saskia Bayerl*Karsten Ingmar Paul

* Department of Psychology, Tulsa Graduate College, 4502 East 41st Street, Tulsa, OK 74135, USA.

† Chair of Psychology, especially Organizational and Social Psychology (Prof. Dr. Moser), Lange Gasse 20, 90403 Nuremberg, Germany.

PDF (56.637 KB) PDF Plus (84.562 KB)

Many annotation projects have shown that the quality of manual annotations often is not as good as would be desirable for reliable data analysis. Identifying the main sources responsible for poor annotation quality must thus be a major concern. Generalizability theory is a valuable tool for this purpose, because it allows for the differentiation and detailed analysis of factors that influence annotation quality. In this article we will present basic concepts of Generalizability Theory and give an example for its application based on published data.

Cited by

Dennis Reidsma, Jean Carletta. (2008) Reliability Measurement without Limits. Computational Linguistics 34:3, 319-326
Online publication date: 1-Sep-2008.
Abstract | PDF (186 KB) | PDF Plus (149 KB) 
Technology Partner - Atypon Systems, Inc.
  CrossRef member COUNTER member