March 2016, Vol. 98, No. 1, Pages 173-191
Posted Online March 4, 2016.
(doi:10.1162/REST_a_00470)
© 2016 The President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market
Raphael CalelGeorgetown University, Berkeley, and London School of Economics
Antoine DechezleprêtreGrantham Research Institute and Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics
Abstract
This paper investigates the impact of the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) on technological change, exploiting installations level inclusion criteria to estimate the System’s causal impact on firms’ patenting. We find that the EU ETS has increased low-carbon innovation among regulated firms by as much as 10%, while not crowding out patenting for other technologies. We also find evidence that the EU ETS has not affected patenting beyond the set of regulated companies. These results imply that the EU ETS accounts for nearly a 1% increase in European low-carbon patenting compared to a counterfactual scenario.
Cited by
Fr�d�ric Branger,
Philippe Quirion,
Julien Chevallier. (2017) Carbon Leakage and Competitiveness of Cement and Steel Industries Under the EU ETS: Much Ado About Nothing.
The Energy Journal 37:3.
Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017.
CrossRef Corjan Brink,
Herman R.J. Vollebergh,
Edwin van der Werf. (2016) Carbon pricing in the EU: Evaluation of different EU ETS reform options.
Energy Policy 97603-617.
Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016.
CrossRef Simone Borghesi,
Massimiliano Montini. (2016) The Best (and Worst) of GHG Emission Trading Systems: Comparing the EU ETS with Its Followers.
Frontiers in Energy Research 4.
Online publication date: 29-Jul-2016.
CrossRef Frank Maarten Jan Venmans. (2016) The effect of allocation above emissions and price uncertainty on abatement investments under the EU ETS.
Journal of Cleaner Production 126595-606.
Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016.
CrossRef Dennis Philip,
Yukun Shi. (2016) Optimal hedging in carbon emission markets using Markov regime switching models.
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 431-15.
Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016.
CrossRef Roel Brouwers,
Frederiek Schoubben,
Cynthia Van Hulle. (2016) The EU ETS and corporate environmental abatement.
Applied Economics Letters1-4.
Online publication date: 28-May-2016.
CrossRef Giovanni Marin,
Francesca Lotti. (2016) Productivity effects of eco-innovations using data on eco-patents.
Industrial and Corporate Changedtw014.
Online publication date: 22-Apr-2016.
CrossRef Ralf Martin,
Mirabelle Muûls,
Ulrich J. Wagner. (2016) The Impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme on Regulated Firms: What Is the Evidence after Ten Years?.
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 10:1129-148.
Online publication date: 3-Dec-2015.
CrossRef Baran Doda. (2016) How to price carbon in good times … and bad!.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 7:1135-144.
Online publication date: 11-Nov-2015.
CrossRef Francesco Crespi,
Claudia Ghisetti,
Francesco Quatraro. (2015) Environmental and innovation policies for the evolution of green technologies: a survey and a test.
Eurasian Business Review 5:2343-370.
Online publication date: 14-Aug-2015.
CrossRef Sascha Rexhäuser,
Andreas Löschel. (2015) Invention in energy technologies: Comparing energy efficiency and renewable energy inventions at the firm level.
Energy Policy 83206-217.
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015.
CrossRef