Activate Activate Activate
contact  
Hello. Sign in to personalize your visit. New user? Register now.  



In
By author

Global Environmental Politics

PDF (115.652 KB) | PDF Plus (186.786 KB)

Regulating Nanotechnologies: Risk, Uncertainty and the Global Governance Gap

Robert Falkner

Robert Falkner is Senior Lecturer in International Relations at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He holds Masters-level degrees in politics and economics from Munich University and a DPhil in international relations from Oxford University. He has published widely on global environmental politics and risk regulation, including Business Power and Conflict in International Environmental Politics (2008). In 2008–09, he coordinated a transatlantic research team that investigated emerging nanotechnology regulation in Europe and the US, which led to the publication of the Chatham House report Securing the Promise of Nanotechnologies: Towards Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation (2009).

Nico Jaspers

Nico Jaspers is a post-doctoral researcher at the Free University of Berlin. He studied economics at Columbia University, New York, international political economy at Sciences Po, Paris (Institut d'Etudes Politiques) and received a doctorate in international relations from the London School of Economics in 2011. He has published widely on nanotechnology policy and in 2009 coauthored an EU commissioned report on transatlantic cooperation in nanotechnology regulation.

This article builds on research for a two-year project on nanotechnology regulation in the US and Europe (2008–09), which was funded by the European Commission. We are grateful to our collaborators in this project, at the London School of Economics, Chatham House, Environmental Law Institute and Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, and especially Linda Breggin, Jay Pendergrass and Read Porter. We also received helpful suggestions from three anonymous reviewers and would like to thank them for their advice. Any remaining errors are our own.

Nanosciences and nanotechnologies are set to transform the global industrial landscape, but the debate on how to regulate environmental, health and safety risks is lagging behind technological innovation. Current regulatory efforts are primarily focused on the national and regional level, while the international dimensions of nanotechnology governance are still poorly understood and rarely feature on the international agenda. However, with the ongoing globalization of nanosciences and the rapid expansion of international trade in nanomaterials, demand for international coordination and harmonization of regulatory approaches is set to increase. Yet, uncertainty about nanotechnology risk poses a profound dilemma for regulators and policy-makers. Uncertainty both creates demand for and stands in the way of greater international cooperation and harmonization of regulatory approaches. This article reviews the emerging debate on nanotechnology risk and regulatory approaches, investigates the current state of international cooperation and outlines the critical contribution that a global governance approach can make to the safe development of nanotechnologies.

Cited by

Kate J. Neville, Erika Weinthal. (2016) Mitigating Mistrust? Participation and Expertise in Hydraulic Fracturing Governance. Review of Policy Research 33:6578-602.
Online publication date: 20-Sep-2016.
CrossRef
Andreas Goldthau, Benjamin K. Sovacool . (2016) Energy Technology, Politics, and Interpretative Frames: Shale Gas Fracking in Eastern Europe. Global Environmental Politics 0:050-69.
Online publication date: 19-Oct-2016.
Abstract | PDF (345 KB) | PDF Plus (367 KB) 
Karin Aschberger, Frans M. Christensen, Kirsten Rasmussen, Keld A. Jensen. 2016. Feasibility and Challenges of Human Health Risk Assessment for Engineered Nanomaterials. Engineered Nanoparticles and the Environment: Biophysicochemical Processes and Toxicity409-441.
CrossRef
Shannon Lydia Spruit, Ibo van de Poel, Neelke Doorn. (2016) Informed Consent in Asymmetrical Relationships: an Investigation into Relational Factors that Influence Room for Reflection. NanoEthics 10:2123-138.
Online publication date: 24-May-2016.
CrossRef
Serkan Erbis, Zeynep Ok, Jacqueline A. Isaacs, James C. Benneyan, Sagar Kamarthi. (2016) Review of Research Trends and Methods in Nano Environmental, Health, and Safety Risk Analysis. Risk Analysis 36:81644-1665.
Online publication date: 16-Feb-2016.
CrossRef
Arnim Wiek, Rider W. Foley, David H. Guston, Michael J. Bernstein. (2016) Broken promises and breaking ground for responsible innovation – intervention research to transform business-as-usual in nanotechnology innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 28:6639-650.
Online publication date: 11-Jan-2016.
CrossRef
Sheona A. K. Read, Gary S. Kass, Hilary R. Sutcliffe, Steven M. Hankin. (2016) Foresight Study on the Risk Governance of New Technologies: The Case of Nanotechnology. Risk Analysis 36:51006-1024.
Online publication date: 2-Sep-2015.
CrossRef
Ronit Justo-Hanani, Tamar Dayan. (2016) Explaining Transatlantic Policy Divergence: The Role of Domestic Politics and Policy Styles in Nanotechnology Risk Regulation. Global Environmental Politics 16:179-98.
Online publication date: 27-Jan-2016.
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (158 KB) | PDF Plus (208 KB) 
Ceyda Oksel, Vrishali Subramanian, Elena Semenzin, Cai Yun Ma, Danail Hristozov, Xue Z. Wang, Neil Hunt, Anna Costa, Wouter Fransman, Antonio Marcomini, Terry Wilkins. (2016) Evaluation of existing control measures in reducing health and safety risks of engineered nanomaterials. Environ. Sci.: Nano 3:4869-882.
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016.
CrossRef
Steven M. Hankin, Sheona A. K. Read. 2016. Governance of Nanotechnology: Context, Principles and Challenges. Managing Risk in Nanotechnology29-49.
CrossRef
Kirsten Rodine-Hardy. 2015. Environmental Policy: Nanotechnology. Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Third Edition1-6.
CrossRef
I V Gmoshinski, S A Khotimchenko. (2015) Nanomaterials in consumer's goods: the problems of risk assessment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 98012009.
Online publication date: 6-Nov-2015.
CrossRef
Valeria Amenta, Karin Aschberger, Maria Arena, Hans Bouwmeester, Filipa Botelho Moniz, Puck Brandhoff, Stefania Gottardo, Hans J.P. Marvin, Agnieszka Mech, Laia Quiros Pesudo, Hubert Rauscher, Reinhilde Schoonjans, Maria Vittoria Vettori, Stefan Weigel, Ruud J. Peters. (2015) Regulatory aspects of nanotechnology in the agri/feed/food sector in EU and non-EU countries. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 73:1463-476.
Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015.
CrossRef
Ronit Justo-Hanani, Tamar Dayan. (2015) European risk governance of nanotechnology: Explaining the emerging regulatory policy. Research Policy 44:81527-1536.
Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015.
CrossRef
Karinne Ludlow, Diana M. Bowman, Jake Gatof, Michael G. Bennett. (2015) Regulating Emerging and Future Technologies in the Present. NanoEthics 9:2151-163.
Online publication date: 24-Apr-2015.
CrossRef
Ceyda Oksel, Cai Y. Ma, Jing J. Liu, Terry Wilkins, Xue Z. Wang. (2015) (Q)SAR modelling of nanomaterial toxicity: A critical review. Particuology 211-19.
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015.
CrossRef
Georgia Miller, Fern Wickson. (2015) Risk Analysis of Nanomaterials: Exposing Nanotechnology's Naked Emperor. Review of Policy Research 32:4485-512.
Online publication date: 3-Jul-2015.
CrossRef
Sunday Makama, Ruud Peters, Anna Undas, Nico W. van den Brink. (2015) A novel method for the quantification, characterisation and speciation of silver nanoparticles in earthworms exposed in soil. Environmental Chemistry 12:6643.
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015.
CrossRef
June Freeland. 2015. Occupational Regulations. Nanoengineering637-672.
CrossRef
Jillian Gardner, Ames Dhai. 2014. Nanotechnology and Water: Ethical and Regulatory Considerations. Application of Nanotechnology in Water Research1-20.
CrossRef
Ronit Justo-Hanani, Tamar Dayan. (2014) The role of the state in regulatory policy for nanomaterials risk: Analyzing the expansion of state-centric rulemaking in EU and US chemicals policies. Research Policy 43:1169-178.
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2014.
CrossRef
P. A. Schulte, C. L. Geraci, V. Murashov, E. D. Kuempel, R. D. Zumwalde, V. Castranova, M. D. Hoover, L. Hodson, K. F. Martinez. (2014) Occupational safety and health criteria for responsible development of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 16:1.
Online publication date: 7-Dec-2013.
CrossRef
Matthew S. Hull, Diana M. Bowman. 2014. Nanotechnology Environmental Health and Safety—What We’ve Learned and Where We’re (Potentially) Heading. Nanotechnology Environmental Health and Safety3-8.
CrossRef
Simone Arnaldi, Alessia Muratorio. (2013) Nanotechnology, uncertainty and regulation. A guest editorial. NanoEthics 7:3173-175.
Online publication date: 7-Dec-2013.
CrossRef
Junfeng Liu, Frank von der Kammer, Boyu Zhang, Samuel Legros, Thilo Hofmann. (2013) Combining spatially resolved hydrochemical data with in-vitro nanoparticle stability testing: Assessing environmental behavior of functionalized gold nanoparticles on a continental scale. Environment International 5953-62.
Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013.
CrossRef
Dominick E. Fazarro, Verna Fitzsimmons. 2013. Nanotechnology Safety Certification. Nanotechnology Safety207-218.
CrossRef
Technology Partner - Atypon Systems, Inc.
  CrossRef member COUNTER member