Quarterly (Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall)
125 pp. per issue, 7 x 10,
illustrated
Founded: 1993
ISSN 1064-5462
E-ISSN 1530-9185
2008 ISI Impact Factor: 1.164
|
Spring 2004, Vol. 10, No. 2, Pages 157-166
Posted Online March 11, 2006.
(doi:10.1162/106454604773563586)
© 2004 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Using Avida to Test the Effects of Natural Selection on Phylogenetic Reconstruction Methods George I. HagstromCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 hagstrom@caltech.edu Dehua H. HangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 hangdehu@msu.edu Charles OfriaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 ofria@msu.edu Eric TorngDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 torng@cse.msu.edu
Phylogenetic trees group organisms by their ancestral relationships. There are a number of distinct algorithms used to reconstruct these trees from molecular sequence data, but different methods sometimes give conflicting results. Since there are few precisely known phylogenies, simulations are typically used to test the quality of reconstruction algorithms. These simulations randomly evolve strings of symbols to produce a tree, and then the algorithms are run with the tree leaves as inputs. Here we use Avida to test two widely used reconstruction methods, which gives us the chance to observe the effect of natural selection on tree reconstruction. We find that if the organisms undergo natural selection between branch points, the methods will be successful even on very large time scales. However, these algorithms often falter when selection is absent.
|