Monthly
288 pp. per issue, 6 x 9,
illustrated
Founded: 1989
ISSN 0899-7667
E-ISSN 1530-888X
2008 ISI Impact Factor: 2.378
|
April 1, 2001, Vol. 13, No. 4, Pages 775-797
Posted Online March 13, 2006.
(doi:10.1162/089976601300014349)
© 2001 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Population Coding with Correlation and an Unfaithful Model Si WuRIKEN Brain Science Institute, Hirosawa 2-1, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan Hiroyuki NakaharaRIKEN Brain Science Institute, Hirosawa 2-1, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan Shun-ichi AmariRIKEN Brain Science Institute, Hirosawa 2-1, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan Present address: Dept. of Computer Science, Sheffield University, U. K.
This study investigates a population decoding paradigm in which the maximum likelihood inference is based on an unfaithful decoding model (UMLI). This is usually the case for neural population decoding because the encoding process of the brain is not exactly known or because a simplified decoding model is preferred for saving computational cost. We consider an unfaithful decoding model that neglects the pair-wise correlation between neuronal activities and prove that UMLI is asymptotically efficient when the neuronal correlation is uniform or of limited range. The performance of UMLI is compared with that of the maximum likelihood inference based on the faithful model and that of the center-of-mass decoding method. It turns out that UMLI has advantages of decreasing the computational complexity remarkably and maintaining high-leveldecoding accuracy. Moreover, it can be implemented by a biologically feasible recurrent network (Pouget, Zhang, Deneve, & Latham, 1998). The effect of correlation on the decoding accuracy is also discussed. Cited byRama Natarajan, Quentin J. M. Huys, Peter Dayan, Richard S. Zemel. (2008) Encoding and Decoding Spikes for Dynamic Stimuli. Neural Computation 20:9, 2325-2360 Online publication date: 1-Sep-2008. Abstract
| PDF (2462 KB)
| PDF Plus (339 KB) Si Wu, Kosuke Hamaguchi, Shun-ichi Amari. (2008) Dynamics and Computation of Continuous Attractors. Neural Computation 20:4, 994-1025 Online publication date: 1-Apr-2008. Abstract
| PDF (926 KB)
| PDF Plus (944 KB) F. Klam, R. S. Zemel, A. Pouget. (2008) Population Coding with Motion Energy Filters: The Impact of Correlations. Neural Computation 20:1, 146-175 Online publication date: 1-Jan-2008. Abstract
| PDF (2044 KB)
| PDF Plus (277 KB) Maoz Shamir, Kamal Sen, H. Steven Colburn. (2007) Temporal Coding of Time-Varying Stimuli. Neural Computation 19:12, 3239-3261 Online publication date: 1-Dec-2007. Abstract
| PDF (216 KB)
| PDF Plus (179 KB) Shun-ichi Amari, Hiroyuki Nakahara. (2006) Correlation and Independence in the Neural Code. Neural Computation 18:6, 1259-1267 Online publication date: 1-Jun-2006. Abstract
| PDF (69 KB)
| PDF Plus (70 KB) Shun-ichi Amari, Hyeyoung Park, Tomoko Ozeki. (2006) Singularities Affect Dynamics of Learning in Neuromanifolds. Neural Computation 18:5, 1007-1065 Online publication date: 1-May-2006. Abstract
| PDF (594 KB)
| PDF Plus (633 KB) Si Wu, Shun-ichi Amari. (2005) Computing with Continuous Attractors: Stability and Online Aspects. Neural Computation 17:10, 2215-2239 Online publication date: 1-Oct-2005. Abstract
| PDF (211 KB)
| PDF Plus (224 KB) Shun-ichi Amari, Hiroyuki Nakahara. (2005) Difficulty of Singularity in Population Coding. Neural Computation 17:4, 839-858 Online publication date: 1-Apr-2005. Abstract
| PDF (137 KB)
| PDF Plus (170 KB) Si Wu, Danmei Chen, Mahesan Niranjan, Shun-ichi Amari. (2003) Sequential Bayesian Decoding with a Population of Neurons. Neural Computation 15:5, 993-1012 Online publication date: 1-May-2003. Abstract
| PDF (130 KB)
| PDF Plus (161 KB) Si Wu, Shun-ichi Amari, Hiroyuki Nakahara. (2002) Population Coding and Decoding in a Neural Field: A Computational Study. Neural Computation 14:5, 999-1026 Online publication date: 1-May-2002. Abstract
| PDF (262 KB)
| PDF Plus (301 KB)
|